"Biotechnologia Acta" V. 9, No 5, 2016
https://doi.org/10.15407/biotech9.05.030
Р. 30-37, Bibliography 30, English
Universal Decimal Classification: 634:738:581.143.6
MICROCLONAL PROPAGATION OF THE VARIETIES OF HIGHBUSH BLUEBERRY Vaccinium corymbosum L.
N. Y. Yavorska 1, O. V. Lobachevska 2, Ya. D. Khorkavtsіv 2, N. Ya Kyyak 2.
1 Ivan Franko National University, Lviv, Ukraine
2 The Ecology Institute of Karpats of theNational Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Lviv
The aim of the work was to determine optimal conditions for clonal reproduction, growth and development of different varieties of Vaccinium corymbosum from the foreign selection. The objects of research were 5 varieties of highbush blueberry: Bluejay, of early ripening period; Bluecrop, Bluegold, Legacy, of average ripening; Aurora, of late ripening. Optimal conditions of explant surface sterilization have been selected depending on their type and effectiveness of used disinfectants. Maximum quantity of viable sterile regenerates was obtained using the mixture of sterilizing solutions of alcohol and bleach "Belizna" with Tween. Effectiveness of microclonal reproduction depending on the composition of nutrient agar medium with organic compounds on macro- and microsalt basis WPM (Woody Plant Medium) with addition of the growth-regulator of cytokinine action 6-γ, γ-Dimethylallylaminopurine (2іР) was evaluated according to regenerative activity of explants and shoots reproduction coefficient. The results of experiments showed that effectiveness of phytohormones action and their concentrations depended on genotype properties of every variety of V. corymbosum. It has been established that the growth activity and shoots multiplications changed depending on the concentration in nutrient medium 2iP. Maximum values of reproduction coefficient for Bluecrop and Bluegold varieties and shoots height were determined on the medium with 4 mg/l 2iP. For Aurora and Legacy the regenerative ability was the highest with concentration 8 mg/l 2iP and for Bluejay, 10 mg/l 2iP.
Key words: Vaccinium corymbosum, clonal micropropagation.
© Palladin Institute of Biochemistry of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 2016
References
Kunakh V. A. Plant biotechnology for human life improvement. Biotekhnolohiia. 2008, 1 (1), 28–39. (In Ukrainian).
2. Mel'nychuk M. D., Novak T. V., Kunakh V. A. Plants biotechnology. Kyiv: Polihraf – Konsaltynh. 2003, 520 p. (In Ukrainian).
3. Banados M. P. Blueberry Production in South America. Acta Horticulturae: Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Vaccinium Culture, May 3–8, 2004. Sevilla, Spain. 2006, N 715, P. 165–172. doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2006.715.24.
4. Strik B. Blueberry Production and Research Trends in North America. Acta Horticulturae: Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Vaccinium Culture, May 3–8, 2004. Sevilla, Spain. 2006, N 715, P. 173–183. doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2006.715.25.
5. Debnath S. C. Strategies to propagate Vaccinium nuclear stocks for the Canadian berry industry. Canad. J. Plant Sci. 2007, N 87, P. 911?922. https://doi.org/10.4141/P06-131
6. Zmarlicki K. Production and marketing of blueberries in Europe, USA and in Canada. International Conference on Blueberry and cranberry growing (with ecological aspects), 19–22 June, 2006. Research Institute of Pomology and Floriculture, Skierniewice, Poland. 2006, P. 181?186.
7. Reshetnikov V. N., Kilchevskii A. V., Rupasova Zh. A., Filipenia V. L., Chizhik O. V., Gorbatsevich V. I., Ivanovich A. A. Highbush blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum L.). Genetic basics of plant selection. Sci. ed. A. V. Kilchevskii, L. V. Khotyleva. Minsk. 2012, V. 3: Biotechnology in plant selection. Cellular engineering. P. 347–355. (In Russian).
8. Reshetnikov V. N., Spiridovich E. V., Nosov A. M. Plant biotechnology and perspectives of its development. Genetics and Plant Physiology. 2014, 46 (1), 3–18. (In Russian).
9. Litwinczuk W., Szczerba G., Wrona D. Field performance of highbush blueberries(Vaccinium corymbosum L.) cv. Herbert propagated by cuttings and tissue culture. Scientia Horticulturae. 2005, V. 106, P. 162?169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2005.02.025
10. Noe N., Eccher T., Del Signore E., Montoldi A. Growth and proliferation in vitro of Vaccinium corymbosum L. under different irradiance and radiation spectral composition. Biologia Plantarum. 1998, 41 (2), 161?167. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1001878901718
11. Ostrolucka M. G., Libiakova G., Ondruskova E., Gajdosova A. In vitro propagation of Vaccinium species. Acta Universitias Latviensis. 2004, V. 676, P. 207?212.
12. Tetsumura T., Matsumoto Y., Sato M., Honsho C., Yamashita K., Komatsu H., Sugimoto Y., Kunitake H. Evaluation of basal media for micropropagation of four highbush blueberry cultivars. Scientia Horticulturae. 2008, V. 119, P. 72?74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2008.06.028
13. Kyte L., Kleyn J. Plants from Test Tubes: An Introduction to Micropropagation. Timber Press, Portland, Oregon, USA. 1996, 240 p.
14. Lakyn H. F. Biometrics: A manual for biological specialities of universities. Moskwa: Vysshaya shkola. 1990, 352 p. (In Russian).
15. Kushnir H. P., Sarnats'ka V. V. Microclonal plant propagation. Theory and Practice. Kyiv: Naukova dumka. 2005, 272 p. (In Ukrainian).
16. Lloyd G., McCown B. Commercially-feasible micropropagation of mountain laurel, Kalmia latifolia, by use of shoot tip culture. Combined Proceedings of International Plant Propag. Soc. 1981, V. 30, P. 421–427.
17. Orlikowska T. Micropropagation of highbush bluberry. Fruit Sci. Rep. 1986, 13 (3), 105–115.
18. Gajdosova A., Ostrolucka M. G., Libiakova G., Ondruskova E., Simala D. Microclonal propagation of Vaccinium sp. and Rubus sp. and detection of genetic variability in culture in vitro. J. Fruit Ornament. Plant Res. 2006, V. 14, P. 103–118.
19. Gonzales M. V., Lopez M., Valdes A. E., Ordas R. J. Micropropagation of three berry species using nodal segments of field –grown plants. Ann. Appl. Biol. 2000, V. 137, P. 73–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.2000.tb00059.x
20. Litwinczuk W. Micropropagation of Vaccinium sp. by in vitro axillary shoot proliferation. Meth. Mol. Biol. 2013, V. 11013, P. 63–76.
21. Jiang Y., Yu H., Zhang D., He S., Wang Ch. Influences of media and cytokinins on shoot proliferation of Brightwell and Choice blueberries in vitro. Acta Horticulturae. 2009, V. 810, P. 581–586. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2009.810.77
22. Litwinczuk W., Wadas. Auxin-dependent development and habituation of highbush blueberry (Vaccinium x civilleanum But. et PI.) Herbert in vitro shoot cultures. Scientia Horticulturae . 2008, V. 119, P. 41–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2008.07.007
23. Cao X., Hammercshlag F. A. Improved shoot organogenesis from leaf explants of highbush blueberry. Hort. Sci. 2000, 35 (5), 945–947.
24. Genetic basics of plant selection. In 4 vol. V. 3. Biotechnology in plant selection. Cellular engineering. Sci. ed. A. V. Kilchevskii, L. V. Khotyleva. Minsk: Belarus. Navuka. 2012, 489 p. (In Russian).
25. Smolarz K., Chlebowska D. Growth vigour and yielding of highbush blueberry cv. Bluecrop propagated from semi-woody cuttings and in vitro. J. Fruit Ornament. Plant Res. 1997, V. 2, P. 53–60.
26 Cao X., Hammerschlag F. A. A two-step pretreatment significantly enhances shoot organogenesis from leaf explants of highbush blueberry cv. Bluecrop. HortScience. 2002, 37 (5), 819–821.
27. Litwi?czuk W. Propagation of highbush blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum L.) in vitro. Effect of micropropagation on growth and fruiting bushes. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Rzeszowskiego, Rzosz?w. 2007, 108 p. (In Poland).
28. Chandler C. K., Draper A. D. Effect of zeatin and 2iP on shoot proliferation of three blueberry clones in vitro. HortScience. 1986, V. 21, P. 1065–1066.
29. Reed B. M., Abdelnour A. E. The use of Zeatin to Initiate in vitro cultures of Vaccinium Species and Cultivars. HortScience. 1991, V. 26, P. 1320–1322.
30 Debnath S. C. Zeatin-induced one-step in vitro cloning affects the vegetative growth of cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpon Ait.) micropropagules over stem cuttings. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture. 2008, V. 93, P. 231–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-008-9366-0