Biotechnologia Acta

...

  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
Home Archive 2019 № 2 DIRECT PLANT REGENERATION FROM Pysalis peruviana L. EXPLANTS O. M. Yaroshko, M. V. Kuchuk
Print PDF

ISSN 2410-776X (Online)
ISSN 2410-7751 (Print)

"Biotechnologia Acta" V. 12, No 2, 2019
https://doi.org/10.15407/biotech12.02.056
Р. 56-62, Bibliography 14, English
Universal Decimal Classification: 602.62:581.143.5:634.675:582.926

DIRECT PLANT REGENERATION FROM Pysalis peruviana L. EXPLANTS

O. M. Yaroshko, M. V. Kuchuk

Institute of Cell Biology and Genetic Engineering of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv

The aim of the work was to establish the effective culture medium for the regeneration of Physalis peruviana for further micropropagation and obtaining of adult plants from regenerants in vitro conditions. After conducting series of experiments, effective culture media for the regeneration of P. peruviana was established. The most effective media for shoot regeneration from leaf explants were MS30 supplemented with 1mg/l Kin and 3 mg/l BAP; MS30 supplemented with 2 mg/l Kin and 1 mg/l BAP (33.33% of regeneration on both media). Good results were obtained on the media MS30 supplemented with 1 mg/l Kin and 2 mg/l BAP (28.57% explants regenerated) and MS30 supplemented with 2 mg/l Kin and 3 mg/l BAP (26.31% of regeneration). Root induction from stem and leaf explants were obtained of medium MS30 with NAA (0.2 mg/l; 0.5 mg/l), IAA (0.2 mg/l; 0.5 mg/l). Root induction frequency of these media was 100%. The obtained regenerants were separated from the explants and were transferred on the medium MS30 with 1 mg/l of BAP for elongation, and then on a medium MS30 or MS30 with 0.2 mg/l NAA for subsequent rooting. After one month of cultivation on mediums MS30 or MS30 with 0.2 mg/l NAA were successfully received adult plants.

Key words: Physalis, regeneration.

© Palladin Institute of Biochemistry of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 2019

  • References
    • 1. Zach a ry H. Lemmon, Nathan T. Reem, Justin Dalrymple, Sebastian Soyk, Kerry E. Swartwood, Daniel Rodriguez-Leal, Joyce Van Eck, Zachary B. Lippman. Rapid improvement of domestication traits in an orphan crop by genome editing. Nat. Plants. 2018, V. 4, P. 766–770. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-018-0259-x

      2. Rao Y . V. A., Shankar R., Lakshmi T. V. R., Rao R. K. G. Plant regeneration in Physalis pubescens L. and its induced mutant. Plant TIssue Cult. 2004, 14 (1), 9–15.

      3. Ramar K., Ayyadurai V. In vitro regeneration of Physa l is maxima (Mill) an important medicinal plant. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci. 2014, 3 (12), 253–258. ISSN: 2319-7706.

      4. Sand h ya H., Srinath R. Role of growth regulato r s on in vitro callus induction and direct r e generation in Physalis minima Linn. Sci . Press Ltd., Switzerland. 2015, V. 44, P. 3 8 –44. ISSN: 2300-9675. https://doi.org/ 1 0.18052/www.scipress.com/ILNS.44.38.

      5. Rama r K., Ayyadurai V., Arulprakash T. In vitro shoot multiplication and plant regenera t ion of Physalis peruviana L. An importan t medicinal plant. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci. 2014, 3 (3), 456–464.

      6. Berg i er K., Kuźniak E., Skłodowska M. Antioxid a nt potential of Agrobacteriumtransfor m ed and non-transformed Physalis ixocarpa plants grown in vitro and ex vitro. Postepy Hig. Med. Dosw. 2012, V. 66, P. 976–982.

      7. Kuma r O. A., Ramesh S., Subba Tata S. Establishment of a rapid plant regeneration system i n Physalis angulata L. Through axillary meristems. Not. Sci. Biol. 2015, 7 (4), P. 471–474. https://doi.org/10.15835/nsb.7.4.9707

      8. Swar t wood K., Van Eck J. Physalis transfor m ation development of plant regeneration and Agrobacterium tumefaciensmediated transformation methodology for Physalis pruinosa. bioRxiv. 2018. https://dx.doi.org/10.1101/386235

      9. Assa d -Garcia N., Ochoa-Alejo N., Garcia-Hernfindez E., Herrera-Estrella L., Simpson J. Agrobact e rium-mediated transformation of tomat i llo (Physalis ixocarpa) and tissue specific and developmental expression of the CaMV 35S promoter in transgenic tomatillo plants. Plant Cell Rep., Springer-Verlag. 1992, V. l1, P. 558–562. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00233092

      10. Singh P., Singh S.P., Shalitra R., Samantaray R., S ingh S., Tiwary A. In vitro regenera t ion of cape gooseberry (Physalis peruviana L.) through nodal segment. Pesq. Agropec. Bras.2016, 11 (1), 41–44.

      11. Afroz F., Sayeed Hassan A. K. M., Shamroze Bari L., Sultana R., Begum N., Jahan M. A. A., Khatun R. In vitro shoot proliferation and plant regeneration of Physalis minima L. — a perennial medicinal herb. Bangladesh J. Sci. Ind. Res. 2009, 44 (4), 453–456. https://doi.org/10.3329/bjsir.v44i4.4597

      12. Gup t a P. P. Regeneration of plants from mesophyl l protoplasts of ground berry (Physalis minima L.). Plant Sci., 43, Elsevier Sci. Publish. Ireland Ltd. 1986, P. 151–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-9452(86)90156-1

      13. Sheeba E., Palanivel S., Parvathi S. In vitro flowering and rapid propagation of Physalis minima L i nn. — a medicinal plant. Int. J. Innovat. Res. Sci.ence, Engin. Technol. 2015, V. 4, Issue 1. https://doi.org/10.15680/IJIRSET. 2 015.0401057 www.ijirset.com18763 https://doi.org/10.15680/IJIRSET

      14. Arvind J. Mungole, Vilas D. Doifode, Kamble R. B., Chaturvedi A., Zanwar P. In vitro callus induction and shoot regeneration in Physalis minima L. Ann. Biol. Res., Scholars Research Library. 2011, 2 (2), 79–85. (http://scholarsresearchlibrary.com/archive.html)

      15. Patel G. K., Bapat V. A., Rao P. S. Protoplast culture and genetic transformation in Physalis minim L. Proc. Ind. Acad. Sci. (Plant Sci.). 1987, 97 (4), P. 333–335.

      16. Murashige T., Skoog F. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plantarum. 1962, V. 15, P. 473–497 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.x